Macbeth, a well trusted thane, was a genuinely good person. Just like Spitzer, Macbeth committed a crime that would change his life forever. Out of greed, Macbeth killed the king. He only thought about the immediate results; he did not think about the long term reprecussions. Immediately after killing the king, Macbeth regretted the murder that he commited. He knew that this was a bad idea, and that he would be strongly penalized for his actions. He wasn’t sure what was going to happen, but he knew something would.
Macbeth did not have a good reason to kill the king. The king was nothing but good to Macbeth. Macbeth was slowly moving up the ranks; however, if he did nothing, Macbeth would never have the chance to become king. If he wanted to become king, he would have had to take action, yet killing the loyal king was not right. Macbeth was not in line for the throne; therefore, he should not have ever had the chance to become king. Whether he deserved to or not is irrelevant, for that is not how kings were selected. Macbeth’s actions were out of line and extremely unjustified. The king was good to him and did not deserve to be killed. Both Macbeth and Govenor Spitzer did unjustifable actions that will change their lives drastically in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment